You are here

Sand Blasting Injury

Sand blasting is generally not a wide spread problem for us. However, some problems do occur to some degree each year. Blowing sand can open wounds in the plant tissue which allows pathogens access. Wind driven soil particles may even carry herbicide residue directly into the plant tissue. The additive effects of these injuries can be detrimental to cotton seedlings.

Sand Damage -Jay PhelpsIn problem evaluations, the first rule is to not make the final judgment on the extent of damage to the crop too quickly. Cotton has a tremendous capacity to recover from adversities. Consequently, it is usually best to delay the final stand evaluation until after the crop is exposed to 2 or 3 days of good growing conditions. Symptoms of sand blasting can range from minor burns to complete desiccation and plant death. In minor problems, the small stems will be very red on one side, the cuticle of the stem and leaves will be abraded away and the leaves will have a scorched appearance. Cotton will generally recover quite well from these symptoms.

As the symptoms get worse, stems will show signs of splitting, cracking, necrosis of tissue and develop a dark brown to black color. Leaves will especially develop a black appearance. This discoloration will generally develop within a day of the wind storm event. Sometimes the symptoms start out very mild and progressively get worse. This is especially true if windy conditions persist for several days.

As fields are evaluated for damage there are several things to look for and consider. First take note of your growing area and the calendar date. Next take note of the soil productivity and whether the field is irrigated or not. Calendar date and soil productivity must be considered and will aid in deciding whether or not to keep the stand, replant to cotton or to replant to an alternative crop. Also growers should have an in-depth knowledge of his insurance coverage and provisions.

Sand Damage - Jay PhelpsAs you evaluate the fields generally you will notice that damage will be worse on the higher ridges of the field. Damage will be less in the lower areas and areas sheltered by wind breaks. After the areas effected have been identified, plants should be examined to determine the extent of the damage. Examine plants from several places within the damaged areas. Look closely at the stems - evaluate cracks, breaks, and abraded areas. Scrape through the epidermis with a knife blade to the determine wound depth. Especially note whether or not the wound extends deeper than the cuticle into, or through, the stele.

If the wound has penetrated the cuticle and not damaged the stele, the stem will most likely form callus tissue and scar over the wound. If the wound extends into the stele, it is likely that the stem will break before the plant can recover. In making stand counts, only count plants that have superficial and recoverable damage to the stem.

Damage to the leaves may range from slight abrasion of the cuticle to complete desiccation. Loss of the waxy cuticle from the cotyledon and true leaves will hasten water loss contributing to desiccation. If leaf burn and desiccation is a problem, examine the last expanding true leaf and the tissue in the terminal. If the last expanding true leaf only has mild damage and the tissue in the terminal is still green, the plant will most likely recover. That is of course if the stem is still viable.

Cure for SandFor help in making replant decisions refer to the Replant Page. Generally as you get to May 20, 2 plants per foot of row in a 38 to 40 inch row is adequate to make a normal yield. As you approach the end of May you may choose to tolerate populations in the 1.7 plants per row foot range. Number of skips and size of skips must be taken into account. Deciding to replant cotton in late May to early June requires a knowledge of soil productivity, geographic area, irrigation capability and the economics of soybeans planted at that date.

In fields where blowing sand is a perennial problem, corrective (preventative) measures can be taken. The picture representing planting cotton notill into a cover crop is one of the best fixes going. There are several ways to accomplish this. In the fall, row the field up and fly (broadcast) wheat into the field (keep seeding rates low, in the 40 to 60 pound range as you are not planting for grain nor for grazing). Then, the field may be either rehipped or you may wish to drag the rows somewhat flat. If the field is rehipped in the fall, it may need dragging down a little in the spring which may reduce some of the effectiveness of the what as a wind break, but it will still be much better than nothing. In the spring, let the wheat grow tall and head out before it is burned down. Burn the wheat down about two weeks ahead of planting. At planting you may need additional burn down but make that decision on the spot. As the field is planted the use of a systemic insecticide for thrip control is recommended and cutworm control is also recommended. After the cotton is planted the use of a hooded sprayer, over the top sprays or lay-by rigs are recommended rather than cultivation. Cultivation will destroy the benefits of the wheat as a wind break. Those who have not tried this will be very pleasingly surprised at the effectiveness of such treatments.

Boll weevil eradication, Bt cotton and new chemistries on the market today make this decision easier than in the past.

Printer Friendly and PDF


Picked cotton sits in large green and red bales.
Filed Under: Agricultural Economics, Corn, Cotton, Rice, Soybeans December 19, 2017

STARKVILLE, Miss. -- The 2017 production value of Mississippi’s four largest row crops is forecasted to outperform the previous year by more than 7 percent.

Brian Williams, agricultural economist with the Mississippi State University Extension Service, predicted the combined value of soybeans, cotton, corn and rice will be nearly $2.1 billion this year. The total projected value for all agronomic crops is $2.5 billion, which would be a 6.4 percent increase over the $2.4 billion value reached in 2016.

Filed Under: Crops, Corn, Cotton, Rice, Soybeans November 15, 2017

STARKVILLE, Miss. -- Cover crop usage is gaining momentum on Midsouth farms and will be a major focus of the 2017 Mississippi State University Row Crop Short Course.

The MSU Extension Service will host the course at the Mill Conference Center in Starkville Dec. 4-6.

A closed boll is seen on a cotton plant growing in a field.
Filed Under: Agricultural Economics, Cotton September 15, 2017

STARKVILLE, Miss. -- Rain, cool weather, more rain and some wind have slowed cotton maturation, but since the crop was a little behind schedule, the damage may be less than if harvest were already underway.

Darrin Dodds, cotton specialist with the Mississippi State University Extension Service, said recent weather is causing some yield loss, but it is hard to estimate how much.

“Being late to a degree helped the crop because rain did not string out open cotton, but given that we are running out of heat, we may have been better off with an earlier crop that had been defoliated and was standing up when the rain came,” Dodds said.

Mississippi Boll Weevil Management Corp. representative Mike Mullendore checks one of the cone-shaped traps located near a Mississippi State University research field on June 27, 2017. The traps evolved from U.S. Department of Agriculture research at the Robey Wentworth Harned Laboratory, commonly known as the Boll Weevil Research Lab at MSU. (Photo by MSU Extension Service/Linda Breazeale)
Filed Under: Cotton, Insects-Crop Pests August 24, 2017

STARKVILLE, Miss. -- Cotton will always have challenges, but few of them will ever compare to the boll weevils that thrived in Mississippi from 1904 until 2009.

“It is nearly impossible for this younger generation of consultants, scouts and growers to understand how hard boll weevils were to control and how much boll weevil control hurt beneficial insects and complicated cotton management,” said Will McCarty, who served as the Mississippi State University Extension Service cotton specialist during “the boll weevil wars.”

Award-winning farmer Paul Good examines cotton growing in Noxubee County during a Mississippi State University field tour on July 12, 2017. Good said he remembers a time when farmers did not grow cotton in the area, mostly because of boll weevils. (Photo by MSU Extension Service/Linda Breazeale)
Filed Under: Cotton, Insects-Crop Pests August 24, 2017

MACON, Miss. -- Farmers' independent natures make them strong, but when agricultural producers join forces, they can take success to the next level.

Darrin Dodds, cotton specialist with the Mississippi State University Extension Service, commended Mississippi farmers for their efforts to unite in the battle to eradicate boll weevils from the state.

“Historically, boll weevils were the prime pest in cotton fields. To control them, it took numerous pesticide applications,” he said. “Those treatments were costly and ate into the growers’ profit margins.”


Farmweek, Entire Show, October 9, 2015

Season 39 Show #14

Thursday, October 8, 2015 - 7:00pm
Farmweek Entire Show,  September 4, 2015

Season 39 Show #09

Thursday, September 3, 2015 - 7:00pm

Contact Your County Office

Your Extension Experts

Assoc Extension/Research Prof
Cotton Agronomics