You are here

Can raw soybeans be used in swine diets?

Since the 1930s, pork producers have known raw soybeans contain anti-growth factors. Use of raw soybeans in swine diets has been discouraged because of decreased pig performance. Anti-growth factors in raw soybeans are destroyed when beans are heated at the proper temperature. The result is an excellent source of supplemental protein.

Soybean meal, a by-product of the soybean oil industry, has been effectively used by the swine industry as a source of supplemental protein. Soybean meal is produced from raw soybeans by processes requiring energy to remove the oil from the beans. Roasting and extruding raw soybeans also requires energy expenditure, adding extra cost to diets using these products.

Previous research has indicated that raw soybeans can replace soybean meal as the supplemental source of protein in gestating sow diets. Also, research has shown that gestation diets supplemented with fat improved pig survival. Raw soybeans contain about 18.5 percent crude fat and average 36 percent protein. The use of raw soybeans in gestating sow diets could be beneficial to the swine producer. Possible advantages include:

  • fat content of the diet could be increased without using a liquid fat source.
  • mechanical energy could be conserved from the processing of raw beans.
  • cost of the diet could be reduced.

Because raw soybeans contain a high level of crude fat, the soybeans should not be stored for any length of time in the ground form without the addition of an antioxidant. It is recommended that only the amount of beans needed in the complete diet be ground, mixed and fed to the gestating sows. Diets containing raw soybeans (without antioxidants) should be mixed frequently in the summer months.

The replacement of soybean meal in a gestation diet with raw soybeans will require more pounds of the raw soybeans than soybean meal to equal the same protein level. Therefore, when evaluating the economics of feeding raw soybeans (RSB) compared to feeding soybean meal (SBM) in gestating sow diets consider the difference in the levels of ingredients (Table 1). Also, one must consider the cost of including a fat source to the soybean meal diet if increasing dietary energy is a desired goal.

Most of the time, replacement of soybean meal with raw soybeans will not be cost effective based upon current ingredient costs. In the event a greater than normal price spread in raw soybeans and soybean meal occurs, the addition of raw soybeans to a gestation diet may become cost effective. This situation may develop when soybeans are damaged or discounted at market. Other considerations in comparing the value of raw soybeans include the addition of fat to the diet and any increase in survival rate of the pigs. If feeding raw soybeans produces an increase in pig survival rate, using raw soybeans will become more cost effective.


At this time, the use of raw soybeans in swine diets other than gestating sow diets is not recommended. The use of raw soybeans in grower/finisher diets will greatly reduce daily gain and increase cost of production. It appears the only diet raw soybeans can be fed without decreasing production is in the gestation diet of sows from breeding to farrowing.

Table1: Example Gestation Diets
Ingredient, % SBM RSB SBM + fat
(8.5%, protein)
79.56 74.77 74.85
Soybean meal
(44%, protein)
16.44 --- 17.35
Raw soybeans
(36%, protein)
--- 21.23 ---
Fat source --- --- 3.80
Other ingredients 4.00 4.00 4.00


Note: The diets listed above are intended to illustrate cost comparisons and should not be used for mixing feed.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email


Filed Under: Agriculture, Corn, Cotton, Grains, Rice, Soybeans, Sweet Potatoes, Agri-tourism, Beekeeping, Equine, Goats and Sheep, Poultry, Swine, Turfgrass and Lawn Management, Vegetable Gardens, Forestry February 2, 2021

STARKVILLE, Miss. -- Each February marks the occasion for producers to share their research and programming needs with Mississippi State University agricultural specialists in person.

To comply with COVID-19 social distancing guidelines, the opportunity will be extended virtually this year.

A Mississippi State University specialist stands before a room of seated meeting participants.
Filed Under: Commercial Fruit and Nuts, Green Industry, Organic Fruit and Vegetables, Other Vegetables, Nuts, Forages, Beef, Equine, Goats and Sheep, Swine February 26, 2018

Agricultural clients met with Mississippi State University personnel to discuss research and education needs during the annual Producer Advisory Council Meeting for the southwest region February 20.

Pigs and hogs feed at Palo Alto Farms in West Point, Mississippi in this file photo. Consumer preference is one reason interest has been growing in people in the state raising pigs on pastureland for their own consumption. (File photo by MSU Ag Communications/Kevin Hudson)
Filed Under: Swine September 18, 2015

STARKVILLE, Miss. -- Low feed costs and steady demand are keeping the playing field level for Mississippi swine producers, but the bottom line at year’s end will be down from 2014 totals.

Mississippi’s value of production for hogs was $153 million last year. No estimates are available for 2015, but hog prices have been much lower than they were in 2014, while hog numbers were higher at the first of the year.

Palo Alto Farm near West Point grew this and many other pasture-raised pigs to meet the increasing demand for locally grown foods. (Photo by MSU Ag Communications/Kevin Hudson)
Filed Under: Swine September 17, 2015

STARKVILLE, Miss. -- Specialty markets in pork production are cropping up across the U.S. in response to a growing interest in pasture-raised pigs.

Before the 1960s, most U.S. pork was raised in outside lots or on pasture systems. Commercial pork production today generally relies on large warehouse-like buildings or barns that house sows and pigs in stalls or pens.

Mississippi 2014 Estimated Value of Ag Production
Filed Under: Catfish, Corn, Cotton, Rice, Soybeans, Sweet Potatoes, Agricultural Economics, Forages, Beef, Poultry, Swine, Forestry December 19, 2014

MISSISSIPPI STATE -- Despite low prices for many commodities, the overall projected totals for Mississippi’s crop values should top $7 billion for the third straight year and essentially match the record set in 2013.

John Michael Riley, agricultural economist with the Mississippi State University Extension Service, said his preliminary estimate of 2014’s agricultural production values, excluding government payments, is over $7.7 billion.


Farmweek, Entire Show, October 16, 2015, Season 39 Show #14

Season 39 Show #15

Thursday, October 15, 2015 - 7:00pm
Farmweek Entire Show - May 1, 2015

Show #3843

Thursday, April 30, 2015 - 7:00pm

Contact Your County Office