Join the Magnolia Moves Activity Challenge!

Home Publications Planting Date and ThryvOn Cotton: Reducing Tarnished Plant Bug Pressure in Mississippi

P4230

Planting Date and ThryvOn Cotton: Reducing Tarnished Plant Bug Pressure in Mississippi

Field of row crops.

Why Planting Date Matters

The tarnished plant bug (TPB) remains the most costly insect pest of cotton in the Mid-South. Mississippi growers commonly make five insecticide applications each year for TPB management, although that number can range from three to seven depending on the year and location.

One of the easiest ways to reduce TPB pressure is to plant cotton earlier. Earlier-planted cotton reaches its most vulnerable growth stages before plant bug populations reach their seasonal peak. More recently, growers have also gained another management tool with the introduction of ThryvOn cotton, which supresses tarnished plant bugs and helps reduce insecticide requirements.

This study evaluated how planting date and ThryvOn technology work together to influence TPB pressure, insecticide use, and cotton yield in the Mississippi Delta.

Field Trials

Research was conducted at the Delta Research and Extension Center in Stoneville, Mississippi, during the 2024 and 2025 growing seasons. Multiple planting dates were evaluated using both ThryvOn and non-ThryvOn cotton. Plots were managed using current Mississippi tarnished plant bug thresholds, and both insecticide-treated and untreated plots were included to evaluate yield protection.

What We Found

Earlier Planting Reduced Insecticide Applications

Cotton planted in mid-April or early May required fewer insecticide applications than cotton planted later in the season (Figure 1).

On average:

  • Mid-April planted cotton required about 2.1 applications for TPB.
  • Early-June planted cotton required about 3.5 applications.

Earlier planting allowed cotton to set and retain more fruit before plant bug populations increased later in the summer.

Bar chart shows the number of applications by cotton planting date: The bar labeled “B” shows 2.13 applications in mid-April; the bar labeled “AB” shows 2.5 applications in early May; a bar also labeled “AB” shows 3 applications in mid-May; and the bar labeled “A” shows 3.5 applications in early June.
Figure 1. Number of foliar insecticide applications for tarnished plant bug management by cotton planting date.

ThryvOn Reduced TPB Pressure

Across every planting date, ThryvOn cotton had fewer tarnished plant bugs than non-ThryvOn cotton. As a result, fewer foliar insecticide applications were needed to maintain plant bug populations below threshold (Figure 2).

Bar chart shows the number of applications by cotton technology: The bar labeled “B” shows ThryvOn cotton averaged 2.25 insecticide applications and the bar labeled “A” shows Non-ThryvOn cotton averaged 3.31 insecticide applications.
Figure 2. Number of foliar insecticide applications for tarnished plant bug management by cotton technology.

Across all planting dates:

  • ThryvOn cotton averaged 2.25 insecticide applications.
  • Non-ThryvOn cotton averaged 3.31 insecticide applications.

This represents roughly one fewer insecticide application per season when using ThryvOn technology.

Earlier Planting Delayed TPB Outbreaks

Planting date also influenced when plant bugs became a problem. For cotton planted from mid-April through early May, treatment thresholds generally were not reached until the third week of bloom.

When planting was delayed until mid-May or early June, thresholds were exceeded much earlier, between the second and third week of squaring. Generally, earlier-planted cotton escaped much of the early-season plant bug pressure.

Yield Response

ThryvOn cotton produced its highest lint yields when planted during the early- to mid-May planting window (Figure 3).

Bar chart compares ThryvOn and non-ThryvOn lint yields, in pounds per acre, by cotton planting date. For mid-April, the ThryvOn bar labeled “C” shows 1,280.62, and the non-ThryvOn bar labeled “C” shows 1,105.40; for early May, the ThryvOn bar labeled “AB” shows 1,500.47, and the non-ThryvOn bar labeled “C” shows 1,241.07; in mid-May, the ThryvOn bar labeled “A” shows 1,520.18, and the non-ThryvOn bar labeled “C” shows 1,181.03; and for early June, the ThryvOn bar labeled “BC” shows 1,289.57, and the non-ThryvOn bar labeled “C” shows 1,120.57.
Figure 3. Cotton lint yields at each planting date by technology.

Across all planting dates, insecticide-treated plots yielded more than untreated plots in both cotton technologies. However, untreated ThryvOn cotton yielded similarly to insecticide-treated non-ThryvOn cotton, demonstrating that ThryvOn provides meaningful protection against TPB injury.

These results also suggest that current TPB thresholds for ThryvOn cotton would need further study. While supplemental insecticide applications are still needed when thresholds are exceeded, future research may identify opportunities to further reduce insecticide use without sacrificing yield.

Take-Home Messages

Planting cotton earlier reduced tarnished plant bug pressure and lowered the number of insecticide applications required.

ThryvOn cotton required fewer insecticide applications than non-ThryvOn cotton.

Earlier planting delayed the timing of TPB infestations, allowing the crop to retain more early fruit before plant bug populations increased.

The best yields for ThryvOn cotton occurred when planting was completed during the early- to mid-May window.

ThryvOn does not eliminate the need for scouting or supplemental insecticide applications, but it provides growers with greater flexibility for managing tarnished plant bugs.

Additional research is needed to determine whether economic thresholds can be adjusted specifically for ThryvOn cotton.


The information given here is for educational purposes only. References to commercial products, trade names, or suppliers are made with the understanding that no endorsement is implied and that no discrimination against other products or suppliers is intended.

Publication 4230 (POD-10-26)

By Hunter Lipsey, Graduate Student, Life Sciences; Don Cook, PhD, Associate Research Professor, Delta Research and Extension Center; Whitney Crow, PhD, Associate Professor, Agricultural Science and Plant Protection; Brian Pieralisi, PhD, Associate Professor, Plant and Soil Sciences; Fred Musser, PhD, Professor, Agricultural Science and Plant Protection, Corey Bryant, PhD, Assistant Professor, Delta Research and Extension Center; and Tyler Towles, PhD, Assistant Professor, Delta Research and Extension Center.

The Mississippi State University Extension Service is working to ensure all web content is accessible to all users. If you need assistance accessing any of our content, please email the webteam or call 662-325-2262.

Authors

Filed Under

Mississippi State University Extension Service 130 Bost Drive Mississippi State MS 39762